Stage 5 - Most aware

Pilot proof

What Proof Should Exist Before Tillzen Expands to More Stores

The first proof is not a perfect case study. It is evidence that real stores can leave cleaner records, reviewers can see missing proof earlier, and unresolved exceptions have an owner before finance has to reconstruct the day.

Buyer wants proof standards before trusting the pilot path.

Tillzen resolution screen showing a closeout issue moving to review.

Operational proof

Cleaner packet quality

More closeouts arrive with count, proof state, reason, sign-off, owner, and status attached.

Reviewer proof

Less reconstruction

District and finance ask fewer follow-up questions because the closeout record carries the story.

Rollout proof

A practical next step

The readout can justify expand, narrow, coach, extend, or stop based on measured evidence.

Evidence standard

Proof should be visible in the workflow, not only in a deck.

The strongest evidence comes from real closeouts under normal operating pressure. It should show whether the record became easier to inspect and whether follow-up was reduced.

  • Packet completeness rate.
  • Missing-proof asks by store.
  • Vague reason count.
  • Unresolved owner count.
  • Manager adoption and reviewer follow-up.
Pilot proof standard

The page should move the buyer toward one real closeout.

Close to action. Needs specificity, risk reduction, proof, and a clear pilot path.

Cleaner records

Earlier proof gaps

Owner clarity

Less follow-up

Rollout decision

Questions

Common Decision Questions

What proof matters most in the first pilot?

Proof that the closeout record becomes more reviewable: fewer missing-proof asks, clearer variance reasons, named owners, visible statuses, and a measurable rollout decision.