Keep
Current POS and store routine
The pilot should respect the systems and habits stores already use for transaction records.
Stage 5 - Most aware
No POS replacement
Tillzen Is the Closeout Control Layer, Not a POS Replacement
A strong pilot should not ask stores to change their transaction system. Tillzen starts after POS close, where the missing proof, vague notes, and unresolved owner state usually create the morning chase.
Buyer wants risk reduction and implementation clarity before moving forward.
Add
A reviewable closeout record
Count, proof, reason, owner, status, and follow-up live together before tomorrow's review starts.
Measure
Cleaner packets before rollout
The Day-14 readout should prove fewer missing-proof asks and fewer unresolved closeout questions.
Risk reduction
A pilot should be smaller than a systems replacement.
Restaurant operators should not need a full POS switch to test whether closeout records can become more reviewable. The point is to measure the post-close gap first.
- No POS replacement during pilot.
- Focused store set before broader rollout.
- Current reports stay in use.
- Only the closeout review layer is tested.
Pilot proof standard
The page should move the buyer toward one real closeout.
Close to action. Needs specificity, risk reduction, proof, and a clear pilot path.
Current POS remains
Small store set
Real closeouts
No broad migration
Day-14 readout
Questions
Common Decision Questions
Why not replace the POS?
The POS is usually the source of transaction truth. Tillzen addresses the post-close proof and review trail that the POS report usually does not preserve.